shop by department

Food miles furore

Monday, July 30th, 2007 by Nigel

The Soil Association have been toying with the idea of removing organic certification from food flown in from countries like Kenya, Tanzania and Ethiopia on the grounds that freighting food overseas damages the environment. Airfreighted food has too high a carbon foorprint, runs the argument.

True, it’s important to consider food miles when you’re buying your groceries. But I don’t think the Soil Association’s plan makes any sense… worse, it’ll wreak havoc.

1. It’s unfair. Having persuaded African farmers to meet organic standards, they’re now moving the goalposts. How much hardship would that cause?

2. If you want to decrease the world’s carbon footprint you have to look at global solutions, not just local ones. Population growth is a factor of poverty; the only way we’re going to stabalise the world’s population is by leveling the playing fields and allowing Kenyan farmers like Charles Kimani, featured in this Guardian article, to make a living, not by continuing to shut him out of global fair trade.

3. As Charles Kimani asks, “Who emits more greenhouse gasses? A Kenyan or a Briton?” African farmers already have to cope with European and American food tariffs without the Soil Association tipping the odds even further against them. And yet it’s African farmers who are facing the brunt of warming as weather paterns change. How fair is that?

4. Mixing the air miles issue with the organic issue makes things more confusing not less. The Soil Association provide a great service certifying food. I know when I eat something labelled organic that it should be grown under safe, chemical-free conditions. That’s what I want them to do for me. I’m all for air mile labelling too to let me make an informed decision on whether I choose to buy Kenyan beans or not, but I don’t want the Soil Association making that decision for me.

/rant

Sorry. Gets off high horse.

Feel free to tell me why I’ve got this wrong.

Photo of a farmer from Togo kindly supplied by Vredeseilanden, a Belgian NGO that works developing small-scale sustainable agriculture projects in Africa.


2 Responses to “Food miles furore”

  1. Jeremy Says:

    The amount of food airfreighted into the UL is tiny - almost everything comes in by ship, the most greenhouse gas efficient means of transport by a long way. This has confusion has got tto the point where the Times ran a feature on the 14,000 mile Christmas meal (or some other similar figure. The poor sap of a reporter has clearly spent hours trying to work out the carbon cost of airfreighting in a list of goods that (with one single exception) are never shipped by air!

  2. Airmiles Says:

    We should have food miles credit card. You buy food then the points go to reducing your carbon FP.

Leave a Reply